-
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Twitter Updates
- Technical issues with our silent disco at the @qaecology party have been solved. https://t.co/BFtvCrKd2y 2 days ago
- RT @sarahmccg: First paper of my PhD has been published! Climatic and edaphic gradients predict variation in wildland fuel hazard in south‐… 5 days ago
- RT @urbanfrogger: Don't forget to vote in The People's Choice Award for most creative presentation - talk or poster. Voting slips & box in… 2 weeks ago
- Ping @HeiniKujala twitter.com/Samantha_Vine_… 2 weeks ago
- RT @ecologibel: Ribbet...ribbet... #FrogFest helped #kids and the wider community learn about #frogs and connect with #nature through sound… 2 weeks ago
- RT @urbanfrogger: Great to see some of our younger delegates joining in! #ESAus19 @EcolSocAus #scicomm https://t.co/iywYjd88dm 2 weeks ago
- #ESAus19 twitter.com/ValaviRoozbeh/… 2 weeks ago
- RT @ChungHueyWu: How to do conservation when threats and opportunities shift over space and time? Smart use of both permanent and temporary… 2 weeks ago
Links
Blogroll
Scientific Societies
Journals
Tag Archives: open science
Anonymity and peer review
The world of peer review is badly broken, at least according to the blogosphere. Anonymity of reviewers could lead to poorer reviews because reviewers remain unaccountable. Consequently, fully open reviews are used at some journals such as F1000Research. In addition … Continue reading
Posted in Communication
Tagged anonymity, double blind, Dr Isis, F1000Research, Michael McCarthy, open peer review, open science, peer review, revenge, vindictive
7 Comments
