Tag Archives: open science

Anonymity and peer review

Posted on January 21, 2014 by

The world of peer review is badly broken, at least according to the blogosphere. Anonymity of reviewers could lead to poorer reviews because reviewers remain unaccountable. Consequently, fully open reviews are used at some journals such as F1000Research. In addition … Continue reading →

Posted in Communication | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments