-
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Twitter Updates
- RT @kathjhw: Recruiting a Postdoc in Ecological Knowledges of Country. Research in collab with Traditional Owners, @DELWP_Vic & @unimelb.… 1 day ago
- RT @urbanfrogger: Excited to welcome new Bachelor of Science students to @unimelb @SciMelb @SaintChantelle8 #unimelbSEFS https://t.co/xzIrg… 3 days ago
- RT @TonyHWindsor: The colour of language about the language of colour ....great orator with a skill for making words matter. https://t.co/E… 3 days ago
- RT @jodirowley: The #frogs have been silent throughout much of Australia recently, with drought and fires. In places where it had rained, n… 6 days ago
- #postdocjobs twitter.com/ecophys/status… 6 days ago
- RT @ecophys: I have funding for a position in life history modelling jobs.unimelb.edu.au/caw/en/job/901… applying the NicheMapR package and developing… 6 days ago
- RT @D0CT0R_Dave: Opinin piece in today’s @smh . For many people with reservations about the climate change issue, these catastrophic fires… 6 days ago
- RT @trailmix_jdmw: This is one of my top 3 plants and probably the best plant you'll see today/ever. It's Roridula gorgonias, one of only… 1 week ago
Links
Blogroll
Scientific Societies
Journals
Tag Archives: open science
Anonymity and peer review
The world of peer review is badly broken, at least according to the blogosphere. Anonymity of reviewers could lead to poorer reviews because reviewers remain unaccountable. Consequently, fully open reviews are used at some journals such as F1000Research. In addition … Continue reading
Posted in Communication
Tagged anonymity, double blind, Dr Isis, F1000Research, Michael McCarthy, open peer review, open science, peer review, revenge, vindictive
7 Comments
